Did not support $500 billion to support small businesses and state and local governments hurt by the COVID pandemic
Supported impeaching Trump for incitement of insurrection
Supported $500 billion of spending on new transportation infrastructure projects
Affirmed Joe Biden's election certification
Supported $500 billion to support small businesses and state and local governments hurt by the COVID pandemic
Did not support impeaching Trump for incitement of insurrection
Objected to Joe Biden's election certification
Did not support $500 billion of spending on new transportation infrastructure projects
stop making me put myself on a scale from liberal to conservative. both are positions that rely on support for capitalism and i don't. at least offer a neither option.
The potential candidates for office, the last two options seemed to be identical. I guess their names were different, maybe you an infer different genders and nationalities by their names, but I don’t use that criteria when voting.
No I truly appreciate the opportunity to give my opinion and hope that information leads to change
regarding the candidate comparisons, the first pairs was identical except for names (I understand why their were paired), however I would not vote for either unless I knew more about them (background, personality, etc). So I wish there were a "neither" or "either" option for that pair. While I have voted for Republicans in the past, there are maybe 2 I would vote for in today's political climate and neither is in my area.
Because I'm a politically minded person, I enjoyed this survey. I wish there had been a "not sure" option for a couple of items.
Made me consider more closely the inner-workings of the government.
I would not vote for anyone who supported impeachment.
There were no aspects of the survey that were confusing.
nothing was confusing everything was straight forward on point
I hate politics, do not follow closely, so was not fully informed enough to truthfully give my opinion to many of your questions - sorry.
Couple of your questions showed some pretty heavy bias in their phrasing. Requiring an ID and other election integrity efforts are not "making it harder to vote" they are making it harder to cheat.
Great survey for an interesting topic. Thank you for letting my views be heard
Some of the questions could have been both a yes and no but was not given that option
Supporting small businesses during hard times is one of the foundations of our Republic. I’ve read many articles on the Maricopa county results, I feel your determinations are misleading.
Your profiles of candidates were very similar and not reflective of policy choices I feel are most needed moving forward. Two-dimensional, but you know that already.
Your left-wing bias was rather obvious in the way to asked the questions. I am sure you designed them to get the answers you wanted rather than an accurate gauge of respondents opinions. More evidence of why polling is now so questioned.
Choice on the first 2 people had the same info in every category
The series of questions regarding the Maricopa County audit/recount efforts were very narrowly focused, seemingly in order to elicit a specific response. They do not seem to even consider the question of fraudulent ballots. All the questions seem to address is if the voting machines performed properly.
IT IS HARD TO ANSWER STRAIGHT FORWARD QUESTIONS WHEN THERE ARE SO MANY SERIOUS POINTS FOR A POSITIVE ANSWER THATS RIGHT; BUT SURVEY QUESTIONS GENERALLY CANNOT REPORT ALL THE MANY SIDE ISSUES; BUT THER ARE SOME QUESTIONS THAT ARE STRAIGHT FORWARD, AND CAN BE ANSWERED EASILY; LIKE ABORTION, ITS KILLING A PERSON
In the questions asking about candidates, the choice is "either" Candidate A "or" Candidate B removing the most American of options, the choice to "write in" a candidate or not vote for any option. As presented, I was forced to choose the lesser of two evils.
This once again is survey designed to give the answers you want rather than definitive opinions. We are not a democracy but a Republic and the Democratic Party has forgotten the Constitution as well as many of the Republicans. The past 2020 election was a perfect example of fraud and nearly complete fraud. States Rights are a valuable part of our country and its history.
The survey was much longer than expected
Race & Ethnicity being mixed as one. You can be white and a Latina, so, to which one will you give priority? As professors, you really need to get properly educated about Race & Ethnicity, in order to accurately measure your data. FYI, I am a European born white woman who grew up in a South American country: White Latina.
I found this interesting, and am curious what the final tally will be. There is so much disinformation and division in our country and it seriously distresses me. People choose to believe what they want to believe and disregard the facts in front of them.
Excellent questions they were so good actually that I wrote many of them down depose them to my liberal girlfriend and others who might want to see another point of view or question their point of you instead of simply watching fake news shows
The questions were clearly written, and I think I understood it clearly. Thank you.
The first of the candidate profiles was identical in content which made it invalid.
I am tired of career politics and their staff members. It is time for term limits for all of them. On the ballots YES means YES and NO means NO. NONE of the above should be on ALL ballots
It is nice to see some very insightful survey's for a change on YouGov!
I didn't like the choice between the 2 candidates who were identical in every way. I wouldn't vote for either of them anyway.
Questions are biased and I could only answer yes or no when it really should be "it depends".
I marked one point “not sure” because I wasn’t clear on what it meant
Forcing me to choose between Republicans for office was painful, especially when both candidates refused to recognize President Biden as the rightful winner of the 2020 election. I was choosing between 2 evils in every case. I realize what the survey was doing- forcing me to prioritize the descriptors, but I still hated it.
This was easy. My only problem was deciding who to vote for when the stands were identical. In that case I would leave the ballot box empty rather than choose on an official ballot. Was not given that opportunity in this survey and forced to make a choice. Think I should have been able to abstain. Thanks.
I found one question confusing--it asked me to choose between two candidates with identical positions, the only difference between them being their names.
The questions about which candidates you would support was terrible. I would support NONE of the Republican candidates. GIVE CLEARER OPTIONS
I would love a copy of these questions to ask my students.
I was surprised by the question about Colorado seceding from the union, I had never heard this idea before. I also want to comment that the Supreme Court question is a difficult one to decide upon because the Court was definitely made unbalanced in an unfair manner (by Mitch McConnell blocking the nomination of Garland during Obama's tenure). But is creating new seats the fair decision, or will it be seen as a purely political move? And would it even matter if McConnell continues to use the filibuster to block Court nominations?
nothing but very interesting at least appealing survey thank you
No problems, I thought the candidate selection process was very good. No confusing aspects. I do take surveys very seriously and give a good bit of though to the answers provided.
What I do not know about Maricopa County, Arizona is whether they blanketed the State with mail-in ballots during the election. I will have to look that up. Wherever mail-in ballots occurred, I am very skeptical that only ballots for registered voters in a household were submitted. If five ballots were received, five were returned, even if only two registered voters lived in that household. I know of no forensic analysis that occurred anywhere to determine if huge numbers of ballots containing only a vote for President were returned---an occurrence that I would consider statistically anomalous.
Not sure what points you were trying to obtain in the selection of candidates on the previous secitions
For the last question asking us to compare two Republican candidates, they seemed identical to me so I just picked the first one. Also, on the question regarding whether I would like to like in a Democracy, I answered in the affirmative because I assumed you were asking about the US, a democratic Republic. If the question meant would I like to live in a pure Democracy, where the majority of the popular vote wins, the answer is absolutely not.
No probs.Serious self-reflection required.Enjoyed the process.
There are not many places citizens can voice their opinions. There are very few safe places to share viewpoints on politics. YOUGOV is a place I can have a voice. I don't take these or any survey on here half-heartedly.
I would never vote for a republican.........
We need to educate everyone to be a critical thinker and be responsible, accountable, truthful, considerate and respectful. The survey required a restart.
i don't like having to choose from any rt. wing fags at all, so it was really bogus to begin with.
Not confusing for me, but most likely confusing for a non college graduate.
Good survey. Would love to see the results.
No this was one of the best surveys in a long time.
I had no problems, it is really nice survey, I like it so much. Thank you!
Excellent survey. All questions were fair and allowed for realistic answers. Nothing about the survey was confusing.
Had no problems and thought the survey should be revealing of the issues in the USA
Good survey, but some of the questions didn't have any appropriate answer options.
Nothing confusing, could have had more choices on some of the questions. Or, provide a box for comments, on why choice made.
No. Interesting. Thank you. Have a good evening.
Greater clarification and qualification of the hypothetical issues is required when posing the questions. For example, it's absurd to intimate that simply because a party may oppose gratuitous ad hoc voting without citizenship and personal identification, that somehow this translates into voter suppression. This is beyond dishonest.
This survey made me choose between two candidates I would never vote for.
I could not support ANY candidate that refused to acknowledge that Biden won the election. That means that your demanding that I choose one when both did not do so was really impossible to answer, but you demanded one. This is an example of very poor polling technique. (Disclosure: I have conducted many surveys in my career.) Some of the remainder were also problematic. I would certainly support Oregon secession would the 2024 election be stolen in manners that you describe, so I answered strongly yes. At present, I am not sure, but you didn't offer that as an option. Again, you did not offer me the option that truly expresses my current opinion.
This survey seemed very biased in favor of the Demorat Party.
One of the candidate comparisons was identical.
I probably wouldn’t have voted for any of the candidates you presented, without more information.
I found nothing confusing. All questions were straight forward and easily understood. I do not think that there was any bias intended in the questioning.
I did not prefer either of the candidates on one question where I had to choose and did not like being forced to choose before continuing.
No problems. I doubt I would support any of the hypothetical candidates I had to choose between as I have never voted for a Republican in my life.
Nothing was confusing. It didn't appear to be slanted towards one party or the other.
Many of the situations are not all or nothing; there are gray areas. It's those to which I answered "not sure". The questions sometimes needed further information or clarification to elicit a strong "yes" or "no", "always" or "never" response.
Some of the early questions seem to be a little vague. Om the questions concerning which candidate to vote for, you should have added the ability to answer neither. I hope this is helpful.
There were some very difficult questions to answer. It was often really a toss-up (which was not a choice!).
candidate a or candidate b were nonsense
You were pushing for a Latin name who was running for office, which I think that was wrong and the results are suspect, and a poor series of questions.
At least one double negative many questions needed a more moderate answer
No problems. The questions occasionally made me stop and think, which was good. I had a sense that the fictitious "candidates" mentioned in the survey actually represented real people (at least I could somewhat identify some of them with real politicians). The fact that I'm only somewhat interested in politics gave me the feeling that I would have answered more knowledgeably had I paid more attention over the years.
One question required a choice between two candidates with identical profiles except for the name. That was difficult to parse. Interesting, but difficult. Otherwise, it was one of the best politically-focused surveys I’ve taken.
When one party strongly objects to a recount, it suggests they don't trust the win.
Part of the instructions should be to ask respondent to write down any ambiguous questions while taking survey. One of the local election questions fit that category.
Too many of the questions were obviously tainted by media biases.
Keep this kind of survey coming. Thank you!
The questions were worded in such a way as to assert certain things that are far from accurate (assuming that legislation would be targeted to suppress votes from another party).
It seemed unbalanced only showing republican canidates
When choosing my race, I would have preferred Caucasian instead of white.
Survey was fine no problem except maybe some of the wording on the different choices.
I'm a liberal Democrat but your questions were biased to the left.
good questions especially about choosing which candidate
Alaska should not be in the breakaway western states question. The other states are all strongly Democratic/liberal. Why would Republican/conservative Alaska want to join with them? It would more likely say good riddance.
Some of the earlier questions were difficult to answer since what is going on in Congress is no good for our Country
This was a thought-provoking survey which made me stop and think several times. I look forward to seeing the results and analysis.
It's been very interesting so far. No problems.
I feel this survey was a bit biased. I am hoping you will use my answers legitimately.
I thought most of the questions were good…. But there were a couple that it was difficult to give an accurate representation of thoughts with multiple choice.
There were several questions in the beginning that constituted double negatives and were therefore confusing. Some questons made me feel that no answer described how I would actually answer if given another choice. Seems like the questionaire confused the governmental system known as democracy with a constitutional republic, a common misconception these days.
The survey was very clear, not at all confusing.
When you had us select the candidate we would support, you should have included a "neither" option.
I AM GETTING A LITTLE TOO OLD FOR THESE I'M 87 .
Your assumptions that the officials whom were responsible for certifying election results were not compromised. The were and are. The ONLY way for us as a nation to come together is to KNOW.. via FORENSIC audits as is happening in AZ presently that the voting is legtimate.
In one of the candidate a vs b selections the only difference between the candidates was their name, which is irrelevant, so I chose randomly.
We don't live in a democracy, we live in a democratic republic. Your questions about "democracy" were misleading due to this fact.
I am thoroughly frustrated with our current American political system. Both sides have become radical extremists, unwilling to compromise. I miss the days of even George Bush Senior. Both sides were willing to speak respectfully. Now there is no debate allowed; if you aren't 100% liberal, you are a racist. With cancel culture abound, our freedoms of speech and debate are lost. The extreme conservatives aren't much better with their hatred of science and vapid reliance on religion in public school curriculum to indoctrinate the future generations. I see indoctrination on both sides. The Liberals want whites to be ashamed, full of self hatred. The conservatives want us to blindly believe in a bible that is vile to its core. Jesus promoted slavery, beating slaves with many stripes, and torturing souls in hell for eternity. Even serial killers don't do that. The god of the Old Testament, accepted human sacrifice and basked in the glow of his followers committing mass genocide.
on the which candidate would you support, I wanted a neither option in some instances
I would NEVER support any of the candidates you put forth in your comparison vote. I understand what you were trying to do, but I would NEVER vote for these awful people.
the first set of candidates were exactly alike
n/a, good questions! curious re: maricopa...
The wording on the majority party refusing to allow legal borrowing was confusing.
Some questions did not have an option I I agreed with and don’t know was a not the correct answer
I did not care the "state legislators restricting voter rights" question. It's seems to me to be a biased question.
well, if it over, it was short and to the point
it's insulting that you include "other" as a "gender" response. you shouldn't be surveying subhumans
I find it interesting and thank you for asking my opinion.
I had no problems but was very surprised about the question of Idaho seceding and joining up with the other states to the South and East
Very good, but could use 1 or 2 answer options on many of the questions
I might have skipped a page In The “which candidate would you support” section because I didn’t think the page moved forward when in fact it might have but it looked too similar to the previous page
I thought the survey was very good; however, there were a number of questions were there needed to be a gray area or third choice. I know it’s a difficult sometimes to get that.
Another biased survey from the people that produce these surveys.
The first candidate comparison question was identical except for the candidate names. If I could have chosen neither, I would have.
some of your questions need middle of the road answers like 'neither sure nor unsure' a couple of your questions I really did not have a pro or con on but wasn't really a "don't know" -- lots of close calls in politics and law.
I think this survey is biased towards a particular political party.
That last question was unclear: "this" could have referred to taking surveys seriously or responding with insincere answers (I assumed you meant the latter so my answer was "never" -- I take YouGov surveys VERY seriously, especially ones about politics).
Would love to see the results when data is collected and analyzed!!!
In the future also include examples where all options include a variation to all choices. Example: none of your made up candidates voted both for funding to help local businesses while also voting against infrastructure funding. This local assistance was the only concern I had in a potential candidate because none of the other agendas actually have the potential to impact my life directly.
The first two candidate choice seemed exactly the same.
You gave only two options, A or B to your answers when neither option was suitable. You should have provided option C, for Neither.
The way your questions are sometimes worded it is obvious that your phishing for a specific outcome.
I don't think I would vote for a candidate that objected to Biden's election results, regardless of their other positions.
There was nothing I found to be confusing. I had no problems.
it was difficult to answer some questions with the way i truly feel because there wasn't an answer to represent me or there was not enough inform given.
One question offered identical candidates??
No comments, the candidate pairs were an interesting tool
Some of these questions are awfully worded. I did not understand the actual question, and they assumed that people had a lot of knowledge that normal people dont
Who the heck is talking about seceding? That's absurd.
Donald Trump and many in the GOP are traitors to our nation.
I enjoy these types of surveys that require additional reading, comparisons and some thoughtful consideration of things not necessarily as simple as many surveys.
I’m so happy Biden is president.I voted for Biden and Clinton. I won’t even type the last guy’s name but he sure screwup this country and opened Pandora’s box of racism
The survey was not confusing at all. However I wonder whether the phraseology elicited accurate opinions.
Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts
Wish I could have had a choice of Democrats to vote for since that's the party I vote. I rarely ever vote Republican. Personally I would not have voted for any of the people in the scenarios you presented, but you gave me no other choice.
This is the most biased survey I've ever taken. Provide more options for choosing answers, you don't cover everything. Many people don't have the generalizing opinions the news claims.
I’d check your questions and stock answers you give us. Some seemed biased. I put not sure bc I don’t think any of your provided choices were fair to the complexity of the question you asked.
That you consider Biden a "Legitimate" President!
I didn't like the survey because it was mainly about politics
There were some questions that I couldn't give an answer.
I found this survey very biased. Some questions were difficult to answer because the questions were so biased and didn't include all proven statistics.
You didn't give the option to *not* vote for either of the candidates presented. I would have chosen that option in a couple of the cases.
There was a couple of the ranked questions where I was unsure just what was being asked.
Thank you for asking the questions. Still not sure about packing the court. I don't think they will try this term.
First off, we are not a democracy, we are a constitutional democratic republic and our core law is the Constitution. I support the Founders idea that the US is a Federation of sovereign states that created the Federal government. The States the created the Federal government can dissolve or leave the Federal Union. The States elect POTUS, using plebiscite to determine who the States electors vote for. In the last election, several states did not follow the Constitution and by passed the legislatures to change how votes were cast. Votes should only be cast by citizens who are properly registered to vote. Those registrations should be purged periodically for double registrations those who have died and those who have moved from the State. IDs should be used to confirm only valid voters vote AND identifications should be provided free for those who are indigent so that ALL valid registered voters get a chance to vote. Now, that said, the Constitution was satisfied in the election of POTUS Biden. The electors were certified and votes recorded. Sadly however, because of the extra constitutional way the votes were cast in many states, those states electoral votes should have been challenged by Congress when the electors votes were counted. Since they were not, Joe Biden is POTUS. NO COURT HAS RULED nor are they about too about the validity of the votes in many states because of Standing and Laches. Only a challenge to the electoral vote can stop a rough election, and congress chose not to do that.
Some of the questions needed more context in order for me to answer.
I do not vote so I wish there were answers for me to choose from that I would truly do instead of pretending that I do vote. I feel like I lied with the last answer. I was answering as best I could all questions but since I don't really vote I kind of did 'pretend' with my answers. You have to decide.
Choosing the candidates. I really felt like I was comfortable with any of the candidates
While I do not believe the democrats cheated trump out of the presidency, I understand why they believe it. The democrats cheated in the '16 primary...cheated their own people. The democrats can not be trusted not to cheat if they will cheat their own followers. This falls directly at the doorstep of the DNC.
The choice btwn to R candidates, one of whom supported the 2 infrastructure bills, did not view Biden as legitimate president + opposed impeachment, + the candidate with mirror opposition opinions was different. It felt like choosing ends v ethics. Had to justify that there were some ethics behind supporting infrastructure $.
Due to the nature of the topic, some of the questions seemed to show implicit bias. Options for answers left me sometimes left me feeling like I'd just been asked "Do you still beat your wife?".
The "democratic" questions are misleading as America is NOT a democratic government but a democratic republic government. There is a difference.
"Parties and candidates are not barred due to their political beliefs and ideologies" - I wasn't sure what you meant by "barred" in this question. A little specificity would help :)
Some of the questions were a bit confusing.
I should have choose "closer to Democratic party", I clicked the wrong answer and there's no way back.
Survey I felt was put together by people who support that loser Biden. I hope they throw him out on his ass.
There were no problems or confusing aspects with this survey. It was an enjoyable experience.
I thought that the response answers to the first type of questions were odd. Also felt that response answers of A or B on the candidates should have included a C response, of Neither.
Interesting survey. Some questions seemed to be from a left-leaning POV, and others from a right-leaning POV. I hope you get the information you need and I would really love to see how this one turned out.
We are not a Democratic country we are a (r)republic.
2.54% of the votes are not accounted for in Miracopa County. I believe there were inaccurate counts in other states/ Countys as well.
Nothing confusing, but on joe Biden, I do think, he is trying his best in a messed up world
The very first question took me a while to answer because of the way it was worded, I believe I did comprehend it correctly when I answered it. It is a crime that Mitch McConnell publicly states that basically their mission in the Senate is to block anything President Biden proposes. That isn’t what Congress is elected to do. January 6th did happen and it is a crime that anyone say it was a “normal” day at the Capital. I believe both instances should mean removal of those guilty from their Congressional positions.
Twice the survey stopped working. 1st off, Joe Biden did not win. 2nd, massive fraud was done with the mail in ballots. 3rd, Check out Mike Lindels videos, especially 9-0. 4th, We ARE at war with China and some of our government officials are in on it, the Wuhan virus was done on purpose in order to enact mail in voting to get their stooge put in the White House. 5th, We are self-destructing as a country, while being attacked from the outside. And no, I am not a home grown terrorist as Merrick Garland says us true patriot are!
I don't have any comments on this survey
The questions on candidates was a FALSE choice and forced me to choose only 2 candidates with no other choice(ex: write in or no choice). You forced me to answer on those candidates that I would never have voted for - bad set of questions to figure out something that was discriminatory and a false choice - really bad!!
Trump won and 0 million people know this the world knows this!
Some of the first questions were a little confusing.
I can't believe we are still talking about this subject. Biden won.
kept asking the same questions at the beginning over and over again.
I did not have any problems with the survey
I enjoyed this survey, it was interesting and informative.
Biased and judgmental opinions formed through questions worded to get a response that will fit their narrative
"Experts" have political biases, and many are actually corrupt and deemed an expert by self-acclamation, or by the media. Maricopa county refused multiple requests for legally required election records, and many have been destroyed or refused, violating Arizona election laws. There are quite a few people who should be charged with felonies. This survey reeks of a high level of bias in the wording of the questions.
Rather biased in some respects, especially the candidate choices were the only difference was the ethnicity of the name. A more accurate response would have been None of the Above in most instances.
No technical problems. All questions were easy to understand. Most questions were interesting, and some actually required thought. Good survey.
It’s super biased towards the Democrats.
Donald Trump is a liar, cheat, and a fraud. He belongs in prison.
Survey was easy to understand No problems.
Would be nice to have a choice to write what we think if none of the multi choices cover what we think or would do.
The Maricopa County bit was hard to read. I eventually got it, but it felt very dense and took a bit.
The section where I had to decide which of two GOP candidates to vote for was somewhat difficult, a bit confusing. But since none of them were "perfect" I had to decide what my highest priorities were -- a good challenge that helped me clarify my own thinking on these fictitious characters. This was one of the best surveys I have taken.
A more direct question--Like: Do you feel that if we don't fix the voting machines and fraud there will never be another fair election in America? Might make it easier to determine what MOST of America believes. Or maybe: Do you believe that official United States agencies tried out the Dominion voting machine "fix" in Venezuela before they did it in America?
It is difficult to say whether the government is doing certain things. The last president corrupted or destroyed every federal agency that he could. The new president has been in office for less than 5 months, he doesn't seem to behave the same way as 45.Many of the agencies still need to 'clean house' to rid themselves of the corruption. I have more faith in Biden doing the right thing rather than the last president
The Presidential Election of 2020 was stolen from President Trump through Massive Vote Fraud committed by Democrats in the states, AZ, GA, MI, NH, PA, and WI. The truth will come out eventually. They have already found problems with ballots in AZ, GA and NH.
Biased…..no such thing as an American Indian….only Indian Nation,,,,my people walked this land long before it was America!!!!
No problems, but the wording on some questions are either misleading or biased.
Interesting survey but misleading. The constant use of "democracy" or "democratic" completed the negated the fact that our system was set up as a hybrid republic. The question relating to statehood was improperly phrased as Puerto Rico is Constitutionally eligible for statehood but Washington, D.C. is not. The phrasing of the questions inferred that public opinion should completely influence how the federal and state governments should operate without consideration for what the respective constitutions outline.
There were no real problems with the survey but a few of them were a little confusing.
Gender is a grammatical term; sex is a demographic term. My sex is male, my gender is masculine. There are no filibusters; there are cloture votes. I oppose statehood for D.C. (it's unconstitutional,) but approve of statehood for Puerto Rico if the territory petitions Congress. The opinions of experts have no legal force in election law, unless they are qualified as expert witnesses in a legal proceeding. Administrative election officials would be a source I would have more confidence in.
some questions had to be read multiple times to fully understand them.
I was not allowed to vote neither for the candidates.
Liberal progressives have lied and twisted information they are feeding to the masses. They keep forgetting, we are a Republic not a democracy. The country started going to hell with racism be shoved down 9ur throats by obamalama.
The survey was ok, but I had a hard time deciding which of the candidates I would vote for in the examples given because they were all Republican. At this time in our country, there are just a handful of Republicans for whom I would consider voting. If I didn't know much about a particular candidate and that candidate was a Republican, I would not vote for him/her.
One question had both female Republican candidates supporting the exact same platforms. Why would I be told to choose between the 2 when they are exactly the same? Your error or some deep meaning I am missing.
No problems and no confusion to report, although the fictitious Republican candidate selection offered is just as terrible as the real Republican party candidates.
I'm impressed with this one. Good questions...had to be read carefully.
Who are the "experts" that stated the election ballots were counted/verified correctly?
I found this surveys a breathe of fresh air and enjoyed most of it, thought the candidate questions could have had a couple dem. candidate questions though
I wish too sat I was vetoing for the less evil in the candidates
Thank you. I would be very interested in seeing the results of this survey.
A president should be removed if suffering from dementia, but not because some in congress disgree with his politics. Asking if a president should be removed, but without stating why he/she should be removed is a useless question. Listing two different politicans that are alike in every way except their name, you need to have a option were a person can can choose no preference, otherwise it leaves a person to flip a coin. I give sencere answers, except when the the author of a survey is not smart enough to provide any possible answer, then no one has any choice but to click randomly.
Several of the questions appear biased against Republicans and the mix of what is asked and not asked strongly implies that none of the authors of the survey are Republicans or have much familiarity with political conservatives in general. E. G. The question about the appropriateness of measures "making it harder to vote, especially for members of the other party" betrays a clear assumption of bad faith on the part of the party passing the measures, but there is no corresponding question on passing measures designed to reduce fraud and thereby increase the security and legitimacy of our elections, even if they make it slightly harder to vote. This implies that the authors themselves assume bad faith of election integrity measures (treating increased difficulty of voting as necessarily the primary purpose of the measures rather than an unavoidable cost of achieving some other legitimate intended aim) and do not recognize any measure that incidentally increases the difficult of voting as even potentially made in good faith for good reasons.This blind spot remains evident throughout the survey. Also, "Experts" were on both sides of the 2020 Election results, yet the questions here clearly treat concerns over the accuracy of Biden's election as "debunked" and flat out ignore the existence of those experts that pointed out the unlawful conduct, irregularities, and fraud. In short, your survey suffers from your own biases and poor design and will likely provoke significant social acceptability bias in respondents. If you were aiming to generate just another push poll or fishing for click bait worthy results, I suppose that'll work, but I can't take this half baked effort seriously as "research" when you're simultaneously so ideologically one-sided and don't know or care enough to properly compensate for that. No respectable publication should give this survey much weight.
Distinctions in questions re candidates were mixed and not completely in step with my views.
The a/b candidate selections should have had a neither option because not voting for any candidate is a real life option if none of the candidates appeal to a voter.
America has first world economy but a 3rd world treatment of its citizens.
Sometimes the candidates were exact the same except their name. I wasn’t sure if that was a mistake. There should have been an option to not vote for any candidate because I would never vote for someone who thinks Biden didn’t legitimately win.
Having 2 candidates with identical records to pick from makes no sense at all. Get serious if you want people to take your surveys seriously
I completely understand this survey and take all surveys seriously. I have a strong feeling about the government as a whole rather than just Biden and Trump who are under the same roof. I don’t feed into the garbage that comes out of both of their mouths.
Sliding scale thermometers suck on mobile devices for accuracy. Please don't use it again. Two of the hypothetical candidates were identical, too; there wasn't any choice between them.
Fact that there is still doubt about Biden being president and crime and problems are getting worse in USA should be seriously considered. Both Fox and CNN are showing signs of working toward not showing the truth but toward an agenda.
The choices in the candidates section was ridiculous. It was slanted and you know it. There is more to choosing a candidate than whether they supported or opposed Trump.
if we are to remain a country, our voting system must become secure and honest
You should have added a third answer possibility to your question about which candidate that I would have voted for. On the last pair I would have voted for neither as both of the choices positions were acceptable.
The answers for the for set of questions need more context. Conservatives are being targeted and smeared for their political views. Democrats want to criminalize political differences.
Glad to see the last portion of this survey
When asking about liberal or conservative, the question had neither but the options did not.
Interesting survey. There's something wrong with one party determined to block everything the other does, and another who refuses to use their majority power to move us forward. Americans are sick and tired of politicians. Once elected they are law makers, not politicians. There's a difference. I'm not a conspiracy person, but it does seem like both parties, together, are manipulating the masses. I believe they're all in it together. Throw us a bone to chase so we don't pay attention to what they're really up to. They have been doing it long before Donald Trump.
The questions of r this survey were very clear.
In the section asking me to choose between two candidates it would have been nice to have a why they opposed the infrastructure/COVID relief legislation (though granted as they were all Republican it's likely they objected to the idea of spending [that much])
For the first time I found one of your surveys biased. For instance you asked about making it more difficult for members of the other party to vote. Obviously I oppose making it more difficult to vote. Although you're clearly talking about using voter IDs... Which I support. I didn't like that you did this
Great questions and topics, especially liked the candidate selection questions
The use of the term democracy is inappropriate. The USA is a republic.
In the choice of candidates a and b, I would have preferred an option c: neither.
Some of the questions need additional choices.
I did vote in the election, but my vote was not counted because it was not processed by USPS in time.
We should have a "don't care" answer or a answer box for essay, otherwise all questions are biased.
I thought this survey was super interesting. The way things were phrased in the beginning - on a scale of appropriate or inappropriate for the government - was such an interesting way to pose that question and honestly- very thought provoking
Somethings were a little confusing and there wasn't a back button to verify I made the correct choice.
First question about choice of candidate was asinine. The only difference between them was the name of the candidate. Both, (by their supposed actions and supposed opinions), were NOT Republicans, but RINO's. (Republicans in name ONLY)
Offering the choice between two fictional Republican candidates was interesting, but not anything I'd ever be in a situation again to consider. Kentucky is a closed primary state and does not have any sort of "two-highest vote totals get a run-off" policy, so as a registered Democrat, I would not find myself in a situation where I have to pick between two Republican candidates.
So far so good. I'm interested in seeing the results, but it is generally the case that Democrats are in the majority of these surveys. The MSM is their source of information, which is almost always misleading or false.
I didn't find any problems to the questions.
I had issues with choosing candidates with exact voting records with the only discernible difference their gender and ethnicity. Also, I would never vote for anyone who failed to certify an election that the state and courts ruled valid.
I understand your purpose for this survey. The results will be compiled for the public in time.
No not very confusing and I am always interested in politics that concern my country and my state I just wish they would get more interested in raising our social security checks I would like to see those people in political office live on what we get each month
I did not have any problems, although it was very difficult to choose between the first set of candidates I saw. Really interesting survey overall!
Don’t like surveys that require you to read a long story
No problems, I found the survey interesting.
this survey was a leftwing biased survey. Trump received 100 million votes Biden only received 55 million the Republicans won 6 other senate seats and 50 more house seats,
The question regarding making voting more difficult for members of the other party. I don't see how this is pertinent, so I selected Not Sure. Everyone I know, black, Latino, white, Asian, have ID cards, and virtually all nations use voter ID, I believe the question in this survey was dishonest and leading.
Nothing confusing, very well organized survey, and no problems at all.
With the state of our country now, I am very unhappy with both Republicans and Democrats and fell it is time to do away with both and have everyone be able to vote as a person and not a party. member. Yes, I have been voting since age 21 and will soon reach my 90th yea of age. .Sure wonder where an who allowed us to be in the mess we are at this time
In some of the questions you gave me two choices and I did not agree with either one.
Questions were framed in a way that betrayed their bias. This was definitely NOT an impartial survey.
Very interesting but a bit slanted in a few places with the multiple choice questions. The way a sentence or idea is phrased can change the answer and not always in a way I would have liked.
I really wanted to say yes on TN seceding.
Only that the question on the USA being a Democracy. It is a Representative Republic.
I don't understand politics. My youngest son explains it an tells me you make your choice.
You are asking rhetorical questions ….. Unless you’re a moron the whole country knows that President Trump won reelection by a landslide
there is a lot to learn about the government I did not no about. im not ashamed to put not sure
Let the people know how many points for their info/the survey.
There are other venues of education not just high school to college. Vocational and technical education should be included.
The first two candidates in one of your questions should have had a "neither" option because unlike the second set of candidates, there was nothing to differentiate between the two.
America must end its rule of.corrupt officials and start electing honest people to run this nation.
The questions involving choices between two candidates were painful and I felt wrong inside choosing either. Given another choice, I wouldn’t have voted for any of them.
The selecting of candidate A or B was confusing to me. Personally, it would be difficult for me to EVER support a Republican.
In the section on “which candidate would you choose?”. I realistically would have not chosen any of them
the "which candidate do you prefer" section needed a "neither" response
First of all no party in this country is trying to make it harder to vote. A large majority of Americans and including minorities are in favor of voter Id laws. Because minorities are smart enough to know how to get a government issued Id unlike white liberals who think minorities are too stupid to figure out how to vote. Secondly the United States is NOT a democracy. It's a Constitutional Republic.
Alot of the questions weren't clear because they didn't contain enough context.
My survey switched from one to another in the middle of the first one.
i think this survey is fair and balance, and enjoyable
I know communism for what it really is. By the. way "Chicano" is not a term that all Mexicans like. I know, I lived in California and had Mexican friends and co workers.
You did not give me the option to not vote for either candidate
The two candidates questions were not broad enough if it were being based on actual candidates.
You should have more survey about our president Joe Biden handling the border and allowing illegal immigrants in our country. Also Biden he is worry about vaccination and at the same time he's allowing illegal immigrants to our country infected with covi19. Make no sense
Some things I had no opinion on but had to choose to oppose or agree. Even if it was just slightly oppose or agree, some times it felt like it was not what I wanted to pick a side.
Many questions were biased. about 50% from my take. Obvious in that the way they were worded.
Maybe explain the meaning of terms used, as some people who have not taken a government class might not know what they mean
the forced choice of the candidates earlier resulted in a force of choosing one of two candidates. Neither of whom I would vote for. What was the point?
I would like California to succeed fro the Union, I was born and raised there, went to school there, worked there, but it is so mismanaged that I would refer that it not be part of the Union! I would happily get rid of DC, IL, NY OR and Washigton! Mismanaged and a drain n the rest of the USA
I think that for some people the questions should be laid out in laymens terms so they can actually understand what they are answering
thank you for allowing me to complete and give my opinions to these surveys
I like the serious surveys that are given here. My time is valuable as yours is im sure. I thorougly enjoy the surveys that are given to me here, and I look forward to participating in many more surveys that I receive here.
Very good survey about the horrible state of our country.
Hispanics vote for anyone who is NOT woke.
the press and tech companies wrongly influence peoples vote through liberal political agenda.
I wish I could take more surveys like this one. They are legitimate questions that inspire me to consider the weight of my responses and to search my conscience for my truth when answering. Thank you for the opportunity.
The section on choosing between two Republicans was hard. It seemed a lot of it was to make respondents pick people based on the believed origin of the names or their sex.
Picking between the two candidates is great. I love stuff like that.
it has a clear bias, and the questions are leading...I do not approve of the system of capitalism. Its cruel, and exploits the working class. I want a true democracy, not the autocracy we currently have. I don't want a master, President , or king. I do not grant them legitimacy. We need healthcare and housing for ALL- not new bombs and new wars.
The language of some of the earlier questions was difficult to understand.
I do not trust any poll by a college, I consider most colleges so liberal that you would use the results to suit your own personal opinion.
Always glad to do the surveys. Most are very interesting. Thank you.
Hard to give personal answer to wording of comparison. Limited information.
None was confusing, but the election is over Biden won move on!
Yes, There were question that I wouldn't answer, they should have been yes and no answers. I believe that Joe Biden and his son Hunter are criminals and should be arrested and jailed. The whole communist democratic party are all criminals and totally corrupt. The Deep State is alive and well in the democratic party and a few rinos are also.
None really, although I found the "candidates" you presented depressing options.
Why would certain states secede from the United States? What is the purpose of this?
Help us figure out how to get Biden out of the White House. He is there illegally!
Interesting survey: I disliked the three candidate scenarios that were both one party with the same views requiring a selection of one candidate whose only differentiator was name (one mainstream, one leaning ethnic) and/or gender. In such a case I would not vote for either and wished for that option. While I understand the underlying purpose of the question I do not agree that exercise is a reliable basis to make any reasonable determination of the reasons for choosing one or the other in such a case.
No problems. Find the survey quite interesting
Miller Lite is a pilsner beer not a lager.
I had a hard time understanding some questions that’s why I kept giving the answer I am not sure my understanding is not like other people because I’m a schizophrenic so I view things differently if something if phrased a certain way I cannot understand it thank you.
Not confusing but you really needed to read the info especially on the candidate scenarios.
Didn’t have any problem found it very interesting.
maybe reword some of the questions and answers to dumb it down for some of us that have to reread them and still dont understand what you are saying
I really do not have enough knowledge of politics so sometimes it is not possible for me to give precise answers, the subject of politics is confusing and complicated for me, that is why in those cases I put the option neutral or not sure, but not with this I want Say your surveys are confusing, I always like to participate in your surveys
In regards to voting. The only thing being done is to make it harder for those who are not legally authorized to vote not vote. We wnat Fair elections. There is not any voter suppression going on.
Not giving an option for extremely conservative is another way to make a survey biased
This survey was very interesting and fun to take.
Nothing was confusing. It was a very informative survey.
Interesting survey. Some questions/scenarios were a little too...divided? It's like they're set up so a person is either extremely one thing or the other. Not enough wiggle room to be an individual rather than part of a labeled group. It's hard to explain. Something I've noticed in politics lately too. Everyone assumes you're either extremely one thing or the other with no middle ground. No wonder there's so much fighting...anyways, fun survey :)
It was a lot of reading and stuff I didn't understand.
I dont really understand a lot about the inner workings of Congress & the Senate so those questions always confuse me
Same questions such as demographics are asked to many times.
Some of the questions were not entirely clear.
The Republican candidates described questions should have had a would support neither candidate option.
The government is at the service of the people not to serve its interests
Appeared on choosing between pres. Candidates questions were leading towards choosing by race instead of policy of candidates.
I really enjoyed this survey and found it quite interesting.
Questions are biased not allowed to answer all question the way I would like
I’m sorry but I think I answered the first few answer pages for inappropriate or appropriate with the answer opposite to how I feel.
I don't think the selecting of hypothetical politicians was useful especially when there were no differences and there was no option for voting neither. I wouldn't support any of them for their voting to spend too much money.
In the candidate A/B selections, if there had been a "Neither" option I would have used it at least once.
I hadn't heard about states wanting to leave the US and wasn't sure of the reason.. I answered based off no knowledge of why.
There was no issues. Everything was fine.
No, no problems at all. It was fine - Thanks
Was a very interesting survey. I thought it was clear and straightforward.
I found this survey to be informative and thought provoking.
It would be good if the selection options are precise and limited. In some cases their is no other options tpo select of we dont have satisfied selection in it
The two Republican candidates shared the same ideals. Hard to support any of the candidates. Should have option C None of the above as a choice. I didn't like either of them.
It was very difficult to choose between Candidates A and B as they were both Republican and support/oppose actions that go against my beliefs. In this day and age, I would never vote for a Republican.
No me interesa comentar sobre la política de los presidentes
That if there not a answer that I approve of that you would put a spot there that have you to explain. Because there are so answer you dont agree with at all . You skip but it makes you pick something out of content that was disagreeable as well as unbelievable.
Something about the wording of some questions were confusing but they really difficult part was answering the candidate A or B section. I really wish there was another chose because honestly I wouldn't have voted for either one but I do understand why their wasn't a third option.
Next time make shorter surveys and it was a bit confusing
I loved taking this survey! I love taking surveys anyway so the more, the merrier!
Interesting survey. Thanks for my participation.
I travel a large area and see thousands of Trump signs. No Biden signs .What dose that tell you.. I speak to hundreds of people weekly and all but 1 is a Republican Dose that mean anything
Some of the Q's were confusing. I would like to be able to add a comment on a Q that I'm unsure about.
There were no parts of the survey that were confusing.
Survey worked great loved the bi partisan questions.
I do not have any comments on the survey, at the moment.
I HAVE NOT HAD ANY TROUBLE DOING SURVERYS
I am always honest on my surveys, particularly when they are about politics. I want my political opinions to be accuracy recorded.
Either I'm dislexic or to opinion choices were listed in opposite orders, which caused me to select the exact opposite of my opinion.
I had no problems. I'm totally anti-Trump and all his bullshit.
Well due to the fact that I don't understand much about politics I don't think my opinion was helpful. There were a few questions I didn't comprehend so I went with instinct on those.
This survey seemed biased...favoring republican ideals. This is not right in my opinion
Several times, there were no options for when I had no opinion on the question or topic causing me to give an inaccurate answer that didn't truly reflect my opinion. There were also aspects of the survey dealing with political details I am unfamiliar with and therefore in no position to form an opinion on.
It was very interesting and thought provoking
Very interesting seeing what I actually thought of the candidates for presidency and overall what I think of politicians. Not very well thought of I might add. But hey 8f I could determine my own pay and basically do whatever I wanted I would too
I had no issues although I do have an added comment. I think government should be involved in what the news media shows. Showing violence only leads to more violence. By limiting what is shown people will stop trying to out do one another on how many people they hurt or murder. Some do it as a way for fame in their weird and twisted ways of thinking. We need to show more positivity and less negativity. We can't change everyone but we can change what our future generations view on TV.
Everything seamed to go smoothly. Didn't have any issues.
If the Arizona re-count shows fraud, then it is NOT debunked; because, you know, it was true. Just because left wing people repeat something like debunked and lies does not make it so. Just like counting fraudulent ballots over and over will indeed give you the same result, because, they were fraudulent. Put in simpler terms (for Democrats), if you count the same bad votes, then yes you will get the same bad result. Those votes need to be purged.
We are not a democracy as in the beginning questions we are a representative republic democracy is mob rule
Why are you still doing survey's about the election. It is over and it is not going to change. Move on
The Candidate A and B lists were unrealistic. No person would have those positions. Your news article on Maricopa Co. was dishonest and did not honestly say what happened with prior vote counts there.
Some of these candidates that you asked about in previous questions I would never support or vote for,unfortunately there was no option of "neither".
No I had no problems except I wasn't sure about which to pick for some questions
The first section was humorous. The two parties had swapped ideologies in most of the examples. Also, you fell WAY short in including musical genres.
I had no problems and there were no problems and I was not confused.
I found the structuring and the topics that it addressed interesting to me, personally I take more than the time required because I analyze my answers and express my opinion with ethics and professionalism.
This survey was quite interesting and my answers were how I actually felt...
The last A B candidate choice was the same for both candidates
This was probably my favorite survey I have taken on YouGov. And I have taken a LOT. Also, YouGov needs to end or moderate their “opinions” section on the app. It’s being used to bully, intimidate, spread hate, lies and misinformation and even coordinate illegal activities related to hate groups. It’s VILE. And the “report” option does nothing.
Was a little confusing. Joe OBiden is unfit to be president of anything. Just another Democrat making Americans laughed at.
Survey had some questions that could have had some more answer choices.
to many gray answers need to opt out of answer or have a no comment for all questions
I didn't find anything to be confusing. I did feel that some of the options were not expansive enough. For example, "Do you consider yourself to be closer to Democrat or Republican?" There should either be an option of Neither anymore, OR there should be a follow-up question of "Did you once consider yourself either Republican or Democrat?" Possibly adding an additional question, "Do you approve of how the Republican and Democrat parties have conducted themselves over the past 12 years?"
I didnt have any problems with the survey
I would like to know why this survey was even necessary. Everyone knows that the Democrats under Obama/Biden have caused a major division by playing the race card and pitting different economic classes against each other. To add to that, this election was won by Biden by mail-in voting, ballot harvesting and a host of other illegal actions. I hope the Democrats are happy with their choice, a man that cannot remember where he is at, what he is talking about or facts about history. It is sad and an embarrassment that we have a man in the White House that suffers from dementia like Biden does.
There was a question asking which of two candidates I would supports, DeAndre or Jamal. Other than their names, the candidates were identical. Also, there was a questions asking where I was on a scale of very conservative to very liberal. I'm a Leftist, which is NOT the same thing as a liberal, but I'm certainly no moderate or conservative.
The music genre section only had pop as an option, and no 'other' option. I listen to kpop which was not an option so had to choose pop instead.
Donald Trump absolutely won the 2020 election
For the election audit a forensic audit was the only way to find out what actually happened, and it is uncovering massive fraud. The statement about the election was somewhat misleading.
There was one question the wording was confusing. On a "appropriate or inappropriate," cannot recall now.
Seems to be very slanted towards the Democrats! Also,on the questions of race the answer used to be Caucasian instead of white! I wonder why that is??
I found it interesting. Our current political state as a country is very disturbing. The extremes on both sides are scary. I try to stay out of politics so as to not worry and because I don't think we should be fighting each other. That said I try to keep appraised of the general going on of the country so I will not later be surprised by anything.
This is a very good survey. I liked the questions very much. Being able to answer them for myself is an honor. Thank you for this survey.
The survey was great, I think. That I totally understood every aspect of the survey. It made me think.
the south forming it's own country is seriously scary
Government is getting to to big and most spend to long in office. Waste to much money. Supreme Court should not be a life time gig. After age 68 they are getting memory loss from old age. I know I am there now. No judge should be a liberal or conservative. But follow constitution as written not as they want it should be.
first and most importantly there was NO insurrection on jan6!!! i know you would like people to believe that! like the capital cop who died two days after from a heart attack in his office! no one has been charged with committing insurrection so therefore there was none! Its all political theater. Although there should be charges against the capital coward that murdered Ashli Babbitt but since she was a conservative woman there wont. I dare you to SAY HER NAME!!! Then there is your lame example of Candidates
You have to stop asking if the 2020 election results are valid. You are leaving open the possibility that it wasn't. As much as he sucks, Biden is the rightful president. Stop allowing for doubt.
it was a little ling winded and repetitive
Like all surveys, how the question is phrased can Change or bias the answer. Like the filibuster, it is there for a purpose but is easily misused.
Some of the survey was confusing, but ok.
I accidentally clicked slightly liberal instead of somewhat
I was confused with some questions. I replied not sure.
Provide funny questions Jeffery epstien didn’t kill himself
This was one of the most biased surveys ever from YouGov. The questions on the election and Maricopa county did not give any option for a conservative viewpoint or argument. This could have been designed by MSNBC or CNN. Just more liberal posturing.
I believe Biden won presidency fairly. I also believe Trump should be arrested and go to trial.
There have not been formal audits of the election results as you indicate in this survey. There are enough incongruities in this election to warrant investigation. Donald Trump outperformed his 2016 results all across the country, with the exception of 6 counties in 6 states. In those 6 counties there are numerous irregularities, and thousands of sworn affidavits of election workers alleging misconduct. We were told the reason that Trump was winning by such large margins at the end of the day on election day, and why that lead evaporated under the cover of darkness, was because mail-in ballots skewed heavily towards Democrats. However, if you look at mail-in ballot requests by party affiliation, they are almost even in 5 of those 6 states. There was clearly some degree of fraud in these 6 counties, whether it was enough to change the outcome or not. That is why the GOP picked up house seats, almost taking control, and outperformed in the Senate, only losing seats that could be impacted by those 6 counties. This will not overturn the election and put Donald Trump back in power, but will at least highlight the shortcomings so they can fixed. What is the harm in looking into it. Case after case alleging fraud are thrown out by the courts on standing. Why not have a formal hearing of the evidence? Just like the January 6th commission, if there is nothing to hide, what is the harm in looking.
There were a couple of questions I had some problems with, but mostly it was fine. I do wish there were a way to give some questions another choice rather than A or B, maybe neither?
This survey carefully designe and supervise
The part of the survey where you had the same jobs for the would be candidates but had different names,almost ethnic sounding.that kind of disturbed me,what's the point? When I vote, I vote for the best person for the job,not for how ethnic the name sounds.
I pretty much understand everything it was a ok survey
I appreciate the more even-handed and thoughtful approach the professors running this survey took to the questions. Thank you to everyone involved in making it.
I think it is past time for trump to move on
No issues with the survey itself, some of the question were a little difficult to understand though.
Why were the choices for the candidates only Republican? I typically avoid all republican candidates. Why were there no democrat options?
Mixing legitimate concerns with bias. Example: Making it harder to vote is just a catch phrase. Showing proof with a proper ID is not making it harder to vote.
honestly, choosing between republican candidates is a little jarring.
Republicans are not trying to do an accurate count of the votes. As you see in Arizona they are only focused on one County
I don’t have many strong opinions when it comes to politics.
No Problems... Great Survey. I would love to see the results. Email them to matthew@grassranch.net
i had no problem with this survey. everything was clearly stated.
It’s was very long and it used confusing words
I'm curious of the secession question is a legitimate polling question that's actually being considered as a policy proposal
I don't like politics or government everyone is the same they all money hungry. Idk why we gotta have a president for. They still alot of problem in this country and not only right now been happening thru out the yrs. Sad that they just think of their self and their peoples.
I don't like being forced to choose between 2 bad options.
So far I haven’t had any problems, was maybe alittle unclear on the way a couple of the questions read in the beginning, so chose “not sure” besides that all good
This issue is sensitive, and legitimacy in voting is extremely important
I have no comments or issues to bring forth.
One of the most interesting survey’s I participated.
like politics and the scenarios really hwelped
No useful comments to be given. It was all pretty straightforward.
I didn't understand some of the question on government policy's
I didn’t have any problems either comments.
Thanks for the survey YouGov keep up the good work
The political candidates were hard to compare since so much of the information was the same. Perhaps a highlight of the differing areas?
Due to ignorance on the mechanics of certain governmental functions, I had to choose a response of 'I don't know" occasionally. That does not indicate anything other than insufficient knowledge on my part to make an intelligent choice.
I think the wording of the questions are quite clever. Perhaps this survey was created before the evidence of fraud and "irregularities" regarding the election results were made public. I consider myself to be someone who votes for the person and their message, and not the party. The behavior of the democrat party before and after Trump's election is a national embarrassment. Terrorist organizations like ANTIFA and BLM allowed to run amok in the nation is a national embarrassment. The manipulation of the 2020 election is a national embarrassment and signaled the end of the Republic and the US's status in the world. I may actually change my voter registration to R for the next election, not because I support the Republicans, but because, clearly, the democrat party is a clear threat to the Constitution and to the Republic.
Our right to vote is entirely personal and should not be told you have vote this way or that because our ancestors fought and died to give us that right.
The political questions in the beginning were difficult to understand
Biden cheated, thru Dominion. We need a complete country wide audit. Maricopa County has 250,000 unaccounted Biden votes, not to mention the unfolded mail in ballots. The truth is coming
i would like to know about the border situation .
I think President Trump was and is a racist and does not like anyone from any other country. He Loves himself too much even though he is as much an outsider as everyone else.
Your question about midwest states seceding makes no sense, and so the answers you get to it will not mean anything.
Some questions did not provide me a choice to answer honestly
why are you doing a survey about election of 2020?
I wish you ask why disapprove of Joe Biden
I appreciate that you want to know my thoughts in politics since to me this is a very serious matter but its not taken seriously in our state
The wording on the first section when asking about the US being certain phrases was rather confusing made me re read the question several times. Even then I was unsure if I answered what I meant to answer
I had no problems or concerns with this survey.
There’s no way Joe Biden rightfully won the majority of votes in the Maricopa County of Arizona. I’m still in disbelief that this state was actually flipped this last election. I strongly suspect there was voting fraud present at the time of counting ballots.
I like taking surveys especially when they teach me something new.
They should be shorter,and less about politics,
More fun surveys and better survey designs that doesn't make you bored.
I don't have any comments at the moment.
I found some of the questions confusing, so may have given a few answers wrong that I didn't agree with, just misunderstood.
No problems other than I could see bias in some of the choices for the supposed candidates.
On one survey question, you had 2 candidates who i disagreed with on one issue. I had to chose one or the other. I preferred a box that stated, None of the above which would have been my honest answer.
I liked this survey. It was easy to understand questions.
Sometimes i want to change my response, but surveys dont have a back button...that should possible if I change my mind.
The question about the 2 candidates that voted the same the only major difference was in the surnames one being more of a Spanish speaking descent and the other not, was interesting to me
Thought provoking questions, some aspects of the content I wasn't as well versed in so I went with not sure.
The very first candidate question is obviously race bait so fuck off with that. The only difference in the candidates was the name and you forced a pick. This would be where in the real world it would come down to who you know or who campaigned to make a difference to you. Maybe Darnell is my sisters husband so I would pick him over Javier but this is only a situation that could happen in real life. Making the candidates have the same view but not be able to vote for both in an anonymous survey is problematic to accuracy.